Showing posts with label Lee Levitt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lee Levitt. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Your Slides are Killing Your Deals!

Here's something that should humble every sales leader who's bought the latest tech stack: Aristotle figured out persuasion 2,300 years ago. And his framework still works better than most of what we're teaching today.

I sat down with Frankie Kemp on the Thoughts on Selling podcast to talk about communication—specifically, why most technical people struggle with it and what to do about it. Frankie has an unusual background: acting school, award-winning comedy writing, NLP, and now she coaches technical specialists at major finance, pharma, and energy companies on how to actually connect with other humans.

Her secret weapon? A Greek philosopher and a willingness to tell clients to put their slides away.

The Three Pillars

Aristotle identified three pillars of persuasion: logos, ethos, and pathos.

Logos is your data. Your facts. Your bullet points. This is where most technical people live—and where most of them get stuck.

Ethos is credibility. How much you're believed, liked, and trusted. It's not ethics per se, though ethics plays into it. It's how you come across.

Pathos is emotion. The stories you tell. The feeling you create.

Here's Frankie's observation: "I'll never remember your bullet points. I'll never remember those bullet points. But if you just switch the slides off for a minute and tell a story that I can relate to, that's what I'm gonna walk out the room with."

Most technical specialists lean hard on logos—because that's what they value, and because they don't realize the other two pillars even exist. Salespeople, on the other hand, sometimes lean too hard on pathos and skip the substance entirely.

The best communicators use all three. And they do it in "little drops"—not all at once.

 

 Put Your Slides Away, Mikey

Frankie shared a story about a client—let's call him Mikey—who was pitching a massive bank. He'd been flown over eight times. "Show the slides again, Mikey. Show the slides again."

He was exhausted. And nothing was working.

Frankie's advice? "Put your slides away, Mikey. It's you they want to see."

She made three nonverbal adjustments with him. On the next attempt, he closed the deal.

Three adjustments. Multimillion pounds. That's the power of ethos—of how you come across—when the logos has already been established.

Reading Learning Styles in Real Time

One of the most practical frameworks Frankie shared was around learning styles: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. The insight isn't just about how people learn—it's about how they communicate and what they respond to.

Auditory people say things like "That sounds great," "We're in tune," "That rings a bell." They process through hearing.

Visual people say "I see what you mean," "I get the picture," "That looks fantastic." They process through seeing.

Kinesthetic people say "That feels right," "Let's walk through it," "I need to get my hands on it." They process through doing and feeling.

Here's the magic: if you match their language, you build rapport almost instantly.

Frankie gave an example of a client she was struggling to connect with. The conversation was civil but flat. No dovetailing. Then she realized: this person worked on the phone all day. Auditory dominant.

So Frankie wrote down three phrases—"It sounds like you were having a really tough time," "What you said really chimed with me"—and used them in the first five minutes of their next call.

The client's response: "Oh my gosh. You absolutely get it."

That's all it took.

Improv for Scientists

Frankie has been bringing improv training into technical organizations—including a major pharma company where she worked with MSLs (medical science liaisons) alongside actual scientists.

Why improv? Because it teaches you to be present, to adapt, to take care of your scene partner. And because it gets people out of their heads and into their bodies.

"We felt it," the scientists told her. "It wasn't theory."

That's the difference between knowing something and being able to do it under pressure.

The Real Purpose of Selling

We got into a riff on the purpose of selling. I mentioned Jeff Thull's line—"The purpose of selling is not selling, it's buying"—and how I eventually pushed back on that.

Because nobody says, "I want to buy a car. Great, I bought the car. I'm done." No—you want to drive it to work or take it to the track.

The purpose of selling is to help the buyer achieve an objective. The transaction is a means, not an end.

Frankie put it differently: "The purpose of selling is to recognize a need and then find a way of fulfilling it—and that might not be what you were selling last week."

People come to you with a solution in mind. Your job is to figure out what problem they're actually trying to solve. And then—maybe—take them somewhere better.

The Bottom Line

Communication isn't about being smooth. It's about being adaptable.

Know who you're talking to. Calibrate your message. Use all three pillars—logos, ethos, pathos—but don't try to dump them all in the first meeting.

Match their language. Watch their cues. And when in doubt, put the slides away.

Because at the end of the day, it's you they want to see.


Listen to the full conversation with Frankie Kemp on the Thoughts on Selling podcast.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

What is the Compelling Event?

Google “What is a sales opportunity” and you will find some five hundred million pages to view. Conversely, if you Google “What is a compelling sales event”, you will find less than four million results.

With sales teams, the results are similar. Most will have a plethora of sales opportunities; many fewer will be able to identify the compelling event that will cause their sales opportunity to move forward with velocity.

The absence of a compelling event does not rule out the possibility that the prospect will take action. Organizations frequently take action based on a risk/reward analysis. I change the synthetic oil in my cars every 7,500 miles whether or not the engine is making abnormal sounds; indeed I pay a premium for synthetic oil and change it regularly to reduce the likelihood of abnormal sounds and engine damage. For the oil change, my compelling event is the identification of a spare 30 minutes on a Saturday morning. If it’s sunny, the oil change is deferred and the bike gets ridden. In this scenario, if the deferral goes on long enough, I decide that the oil change cannot wait any longer and it gets a higher priority than the bike ride.

On the other hand, the end of a car lease is a compelling event. If the lease is over on February 28, the car must be turned in by February 28. (This begs the question as to whether anyone changes the oil on a leased vehicle).

Similarly in sales, most responses to the question “what is the compelling event” driving this opportunity initiates a conversation about the symptoms or factors that may drive a risk/reward decision. “The system is performing poorly.” “We’re running out of space/power in the data center.” “Profitability is down.” “The CIO thinks our stuff is cool.”

None of these will cause the organization to act. How long can the company continue to run with a poorly performing system, without any spare space/power in the data center, with low profitability? Many function for years in this environment, choosing to invest in other, higher priority activities or to make no investment (all too common over the past couple of years.)

A workable definition of the compelling event is as follows:

A compelling event has an economic owner, a defined date and is a direct response to a business pressure. The action is expected to deliver a significant business result (either improving opportunity/capability or reducing pain). The compelling event defines the reason for the economic owner to act.

The compelling event, or its absence, is a strong leading indicator for the probability of success regarding the opportunity.

The symptoms described above may well be contributing to a risk/reward decision. I coach sales teams to look beyond the symptoms (and the technical owners of those problems) and identify for the economic owner. If that economic owner has chosen to address the issue, he or she will have a project plan with milestones and actions. The technical owners will hold the pieces of that plan but may not be able to identify the underlying plan. Once the sales team connects with the economic owner, a discovery process will determine whether the opportunity is real, the “fit” between seller and buyer, and ultimately the likelihood of success.

It’s time to surgically remove the sales person’s “happy ears” (“they think our stuff is cool…I have a deal!”)  and train them to focus on issues of real importance to their customers…issues that have significant business value when addressed.

Happy Selling!

Lee