Your Buyer Has Already Decided. They're Just Building Their Alibi.

The deal isn't stuck because of the business case.

It's stuck because someone on that buying committee is afraid — and the rep across the table is afraid too.

We've trained an entire generation of sellers to lead with logic. ROI calculators. Total cost of ownership. Payback period. We've handed buyers every rational reason to say yes, then watched deals die in committee anyway. We call it "no decision." We blame the economy. We blame the champion who didn't have enough pull.

We never blame the fear. On either side of the table.

The spreadsheet comes later. The spreadsheet is the alibi.

 

 

Emotion Drives the Decision. Logic Defends It.

Here's what the research tells us — and what the best sales leaders already know in their gut: emotion drives decisions. Logic defends them.

Your buyer isn't evaluating your solution with a spreadsheet. They're evaluating it with everything that has ever happened to them in a job like this one. The failed implementation three years ago. The vendor who overpromised and underdelivered. The career risk of being the person who signed the check on something that didn't work.

That spreadsheet with the 14-month payback period? It's not the decision. It's the alibi. It's what they show the CFO after they've already decided — or decided not to decide. The ROI model doesn't move the deal. It gives someone permission to defend the decision they've already made emotionally.

This isn't a controversial idea in behavioral economics. It's settled science. But most sales organizations are still building their entire go-to-market motion around the spreadsheet — and wondering why qualified deals keep going quiet.

But Here's the Part Nobody Talks About

Your rep is doing exactly the same thing.

They rush to the demo because silence feels like rejection. They pile on slides because they don't trust the relationship to hold without the content propping it up. The buyer goes quiet — and instead of slowing down and asking a harder question, the rep sends another deck. More features. More case studies. More reasons why this is the right decision.

None of which addresses what's actually happening.

The buyer is afraid of making the wrong call. The rep is afraid of losing the deal. Two people at the table, both afraid, neither one saying so. The conversation stays at the surface — features, timelines, pricing — because going deeper feels risky for everyone involved.

Two people at the table, both afraid. Neither one fessing up. That's not a pipeline problem. That's a system problem.

Most sales methodologies treat this as a buyer problem. Get better at objection handling. Build a stronger business case. Increase executive alignment. All useful, all insufficient — because they assume the buyer is the only one who needs to change.

The best sales leaders I know understand something different: when deals stall consistently, it's rarely a talent problem. It's a system problem. The system hasn't given reps the language, the tools, or the psychological safety to have the real conversation.

The Five Reasons Deals Actually Stall

Not all stalled deals are stuck for the same reason. That sounds obvious until you watch a sales organization apply the same fix — more pressure, more activity, an executive call — to every stalled deal in the pipeline regardless of why it stalled.

Sometimes that works. Usually it doesn't. And when it doesn't, the cost isn't just the deal. It's the quarter.

We've identified five distinct reasons deals stall — and each one demands a different response. We call it STUCK™. When you know which of the five it is, you know what your rep needs to do differently. When you don't, you're guessing. And guessing is expensive at enterprise deal sizes.

The diagnostic question isn't "what objection do I need to answer?" It's "where is this buyer stuck, and what does my rep actually need right now?" Those are different questions. They lead to different conversations. And they produce different outcomes.

What the System Looks Like When It's Working

The organizations closing the deals that matter aren't the ones with the most aggressive reps or the most sophisticated comp plans. They're the ones who've built a system that reduces fear on both sides of the table — and gives their leaders the diagnostic tools to know what's actually going on inside a stalled opportunity.

That means pipeline reviews that inspect risk, not just activity. Coaching conversations that address what's happening in the rep's head, not just what's happening in the deal. Discovery that earns the right to go deep before it goes wide. And a shared language between rep and manager that makes it safe to say "I don't know what's actually going on here" without that being a career-limiting admission.

It means leaders who know the difference between a deal that needs more time and a deal that needs a different approach. Who can tell whether a rep is stuck on the mechanics of the deal or stuck in their own head about it. Who inspect outcomes, not optics.

None of this requires firing your bottom third. None of it requires a new CRM or a new comp plan. It requires a different game.

That's not magic. It's methodology.

The Right Game

For most of the history of enterprise sales, we've been playing two games at the same table. The rep is playing the seller's game — activity metrics, stage progression, close plans. The buyer is playing their own game — managing internal risk, building consensus, protecting their career.

Those games don't naturally align. In fact, the more aggressively the rep plays their game, the more threatened the buyer feels playing theirs. Pressure accelerates retreat. More deck, more quiet. More urgency, more committee reviews.

The shift — the one that changes everything — is when the rep stops playing against the buyer and starts playing with them. When the question changes from "how do I move this deal forward?" to "what does this buyer need to make a good decision?" When the rep's success and the buyer's success stop being in tension and start being the same thing.

Together We Win™ isn't a slogan. It's a different operating principle. And building a sales organization around it — from how you hire to how you coach to how you inspect — is what separates the teams that scale from the ones that stall.

 If your pipeline is softer than it should be heading into the back half of the year, let's talk.

If your pipeline is softer than it should be heading into the back half of the year, let’s talk.

We work with Sales and enablement leaders at established and emerging tech and services companies who know something isn’t working but aren’t sure what to fix first. Start with the work we do at aceleragroup.com/services — then book 30 minutes at meet.aceleragroup.com and let’s take a look at what’s stuck.

Lee Levitt

Principal, The Acelera Group

Thoughts on Selling™

meet.aceleragroup.com

Hey, Lets Do Value Selling

Over the past few months, a number of senior sales leaders have reached out for help, stating "we want to implement value selling."

They see value selling as a tool to unlock more value (revenue) or to improve their pipeline or to gain a competitive selling edge.

They are on the right path...value selling can certainly have a net positive impact on revenue, pipeline and competitiveness.

However, their perception of value selling and how it's implemented is a bit short sighted. Value selling is not a thing. You don't "implement value selling." 

Value Selling Is Not a Tool

First and foremost, value selling is not a tool; rather, it's a mindset. Value selling is a way of thinking about how to engage with customers and requires a broad organizational commitment to putting the customer first.

Value selling focuses on the customer's strategic business goals (not technology habits). It focuses on the firmagraphics (the culture) of the buying entity (first mover/late adopter, risk taker/risk adverse, etc). It considers the needs/wants/desires of the individual stakeholders and contributors to the buying process. Value selling requires a specific focus on the use of language to align with those entities.

As a result, value selling is not something easily boiled down to Step One, Step Two, Step Three...

Instead, a value selling approach should be baked into onboarding, selling preparation, communications, actions and activities. And it requires an organization-wide change management process.

Start With Opportunity and Account Planning

Opportunity planning and development, and its cousin, account planning, are great places to start. 

Traditional opportunity planning starts with a profile of the target customer (focusing on installed base and potential budget) and the questions "what can we sell them and how much share can we steal from a competitor?" As this approach is highly transactional and competitive, it leads to sales with low profitability and mediocre customer satisfaction ratings. Sound familiar?

Value centered opportunity planning also starts with a profile of the target customer, but with a focus on strategic business goals, the gaps between goals and capabilities and the motivations of the organization and the key stakeholders. Reps or teams consider how they can help the organization to achieve these goals, independent of any product or service offering (Solution development comes much later.)

Value selling involves co-creation with the customer, and in many, perhaps most cases, doesn't have much impact on existing vendor relationships. It tends to focus on net-new value creation, generating far larger impact and results than a simple vendor substitution might.

There's no comparison of vendors' TCO in value selling. It's just not relevant. That's pocket fluff in comparison to the impact true co-creation offers. Why focus on shaving 10% in operating costs if the project could lead to a 20% increase in customer satisfaction or manufacturing quality. Most of the senior executives, the decision makers in a strategic project, will focus on the latter.

The team must consider "are we well positioned to help the customer achieve their goals?"  Once the organizational goals are identified, the reps or teams develop an influence map that details the key stakeholders, the strength of the relationships, and an action plan to further develop those relationships.

Finally, the team develops powerful messaging that emphasizes alignment and ability of the team to help the organization achieve their strategic goals, and the ability of the individual stakeholders to meet their personal goals.

As with any strategic sales improvement project, the assistance of a knowledgeable sales enablement sherpa to provide direction and to carry the load is critical. If you don't get value selling right the first time, you won't get a second chance. Senior management...and the sales team...will move on to other shiny new objects.  

Thanks!

Lee

 

Running and Selling

In many ways, running is similar to selling. Both involve preparation, patience, diligence, sweat and a lot of "failure."

Great coaches tell their athletes to prepare for next year’s race, or the year after. Building the foundation for success takes a long time. You shouldn’t expect to do it in one season or in one quarter. The work you’re doing now will pay off down the road, way down the road.

Yet we expect our sellers to come up to speed quickly….and the quicker the better. We measure “Time to First Revenue” as a key indicator of new hire performance and of onboarding program effectiveness. What we’re probably measuring, instead, is the persistence of a pre-existing deal in the territory, or perhaps a sales manager who’s closing deals for her new reps.

And we expect immediate results each time the organization pivots, whether it’s due to a new product introduction, or a strategic shift in sales priorities, or the sudden WFH status of much of the sales organization and customer base. It’s like telling a mile specialist that next week he’s competing in the marathon, or a marathoner that she’ll be competing in an Iron Man triathlon with its multiple disciplines.

Sometimes those pivots are unavoidable. Reps are now selling 100% by phone or video conference, with no expectation that they will be able to resume face to face selling any time soon.

But here’s the thing. Selling remotely is different than selling face to face. And buying is different today. Buyers are behaving differently. Sure, many still have projects to complete (or to start). They still have project plans and milestones and MBOs. But their reality is quite different today than it was in January of this year.

Their organizational challenges have shifted, perhaps dramatically. Some of their customers, partners and consumers are out of business or out of work. Their personal challenges have increased — remote working and management, loss of traditional support systems and day care, drop in household income, sick family members, the anxiety of the unknown.

So lets take a step back, take this opportunity to pose the question — “what serves our customers, our organization now?” How can we use this time to (re)build a strong foundation — relationships with our customers and prospects, deeper set of selling and relationship management skills.

With no races on the calendar, professional coaches point out that this year presents a unique opportunity for athletes, normally in a pre-race training cycle, to focus on building a strong fitness foundation, one that will serve the athlete for years to come, to improve their results several years out.

Similarly, the enforced WFH and dramatically different selling environment presents a unique opportunity for sales people to focus on relationship development, account research and preparation, and, importantly, their emotional intelligence.

How will you ensure that your sales teams both build a foundation for future success and keep the lights on this quarter?

Thanks!

Lee

Winning in 2010

While 2009 was a difficult year, 2010 represents tremendous opportunity. Early indicators suggest that the economy is on the mend. While I don't expect budgets and activities to return to 2007 levels, executives have stopped behaving like ostriches and are increasingly considering how to build and improve business operations.We're seeing this in both our own client base and in our daily conversations with hundreds of IT decision makers.

I've called the fourth quarter of 2009 the most important quarter of the decade. Hopefully, you ended the quarter strongly and are well positioned for success in 2010 and beyond. This new quarter will also be critical -- market share is still up for grabs and as you solidify your position within accounts and markets, you will be ensuring future profitability for many years to come.

Weaker competitors are still sitting on the sidelines, wondering what has happened and whether their fortunes will ever change. Agile competitors have already launched new tactics to gain market share in well defined target segments.

To help you move forward strongly, I'll provide some context and the sales productivity framework Tom Barrieau and I developed at IDC. The framework includes the following five major levers of sales productivity:

• Talent Management
• Sales Management
• Sales Methodology
• Sales Enablement
• Customer Intelligence

Each of these five levers incorporates a number of elements. In the interest of time, we won't go into those today. Additionally, we're going to leave off the discussion of the heart of the framework itself -- the issue of sales productivity.

Sales productivity is a meaty issue. Most B2B organizations have some definition of sales productivity and in our experience most of those definitions lead to one rathole or another. (Hint -- it's not the number of calls a rep makes or the amount of revenue delivered in a given time period).

For an initial discussion of sales productivity measures, please see the IDC best practices report we published in 2008 on sales metrics and KPIs. This report will help you to start thinking about how you can collect the sales metrics and KPIs that allow you to measure true sales productivity and leverage that knowledge into action that improves your productivity.

That's an important big picture discussion, but not one that will help you to improve your performance next month. You need to balance the important and urgent tasks (See the Covey matrix to the right). If you ignore the important tasks, they will eventually become urgent...and how most sales organizations manage sales productivity is becoming urgent.

Today, however, the urgent tasks are becoming even more urgent. The steps to ensure improved revenue performance over the next two quarters boil down to the following:

• Sales people must have the right conversations with the right prospects at the right time!

It seems so simple. Yet most larger B2B sales organizations are still working on organizational realignment, tactics to extract more revenue with their existing customers or what to do about a competitive threat. While these are useful discussions, they must not form the basis of your market development strategy.

If you can get past those discussions, here are the steps to take. They map to the three levers listed above in italics:

#1. Target the Right Prospects and Customers at the Right Time (Customer Intelligence)

This is simple. You have useful data in your customer and prospect databases. Ask a couple of your best and brightest business analysts to answer the questions:

• Which of our prospects said "no" to us six to nine months ago?
• Which of our prospects has contracts coming up for renewal in the next three months?
• Which of our competitors is having a tough time in the market?
• What is the buying profile of our customers? After they've bought something from us, what is the next most likely purchase, and when does that purchase typically happen?
• What triggers signal buying intent?
  
• Which of our prospects is growing fastest?
• Which of our clients is growing fastest?

Once you've completed this analysis (and you should be conducting it at least quarterly), you'll have a series of lists of sales targets and a good set of "stories" as to when and why a particular target will buy. Work with field marketing to deliver targeted messages. Work with sales operations to parse out the targets on a controlled, measured basis. Monitor the results carefully -- some of these segments will respond better than others, and you will want to shift your marketing and sales resources to the most productive segments.

#2. Deliver the Right Conversations (Sales Enablement)

As part of this initiative, you will need to rearchitect the sales conversations. What are the key "care-abouts" of a given client or prospect? Why should a given prospect buy now? Why should a client upgrade now? (Hint, it's not because you need the revenue!). Deliver these new sales conversations as scripts for territory reps and channel partners. Deliver them as podcasts for enterprise reps and channel partners. Validate those conversations by asking for feedback. Congratulations, you've now just improved your sales enablement capabilities.

#3. Ensure the Right Behaviors (Sales Management)

You've got a secret weapon in your sales organization. This secret weapon can be used to significantly improve sales performance and results, yet in most organizations this resource is spending most of its time filling out reports to deliver to management. Oops.

This secret weapon is your first line sales manager. When the manager spends most of his or her time coaching reps, rep performance soars. In the short term, lighten up on the managers' reporting responsibilities. In the longer term, rearchitect this role so that it is a coaching role rather than a data management role. For a deep discussion of the first line sales manager role and related best practices, take a look at this recent IDC report.

Effective sales management also ensures the application of the appropriate resources to specific pipeline development activities. While few organizations expect their highly paid enterprise reps to be conducting marketing activities, these same reps may be expected to both cold call new opportunities and to manage existing relationships. Savvy organizations disaggregate the sales function, applying specialized resources to specific tasks. (I'll cover this issue in detail in an upcoming newsletter).

Good luck out there. And please, take these issues on with the sense of urgency that they require.


Thanks,

Lee